Scriptural Savant

Home / Scripture / Book of Mormon / Alma

Alma 52

Decoyed Out of Their Strongholds — Ammoron's War and the Retaking of Mulek

Alma 52: c. 66–64 BC, spanning the twenty-sixth through the twenty-eighth years of the reign of the judges. Amalickiah is dead, but the war is not over — for the ambition that drove him simply passes to his brother. On the first morning of the new year the Lamanites wake to find their king slain in his tent and Teancum ready to give battle; affrighted, they abandon the drive into the land northward and fall back into the city of Mulek behind their fortifications. Ammoron, Amalickiah's brother, is made king in his stead and commands his armies to hold the cities they have taken *by the shedding of blood.* Teancum, judging the Lamanite forts too strong to storm with his numbers, holds the line through the winter, fortifying and waiting, until Moroni sends reinforcements and orders: retain the Lamanite prisoners as a ransom for the Nephites they hold, secure the narrow pass into the land northward, and seek by stratagem to retake the lost cities. When an embassy fails to draw the Lamanite commander Jacob — a Zoramite of unconquerable spirit — out of Mulek onto fair ground, Moroni resolves on a decoy: Teancum marches a small force down the seashore to bait the Lamanite army into a pursuit, drawing them out of the city; Moroni, who has marched by night through the wilderness, takes the emptied city; and the pursuing Lamanites, met by fresh troops under Lehi and caught between Lehi's men and Moroni's, are surrounded. Jacob falls and Moroni is wounded in a furious clash; the rest surrender, the prisoners outnumbering the slain. The chapter shows the war's ambition outliving the man who began it, and sets Moroni's lawful, life-sparing war-craft — winning cities by wit and sparing lives by ransom — against the Lamanites' bloody holding of what blood had taken.

Open printable insert (PDF) ↗Scripture only →

Witnesses on the page:Amalickiah & Ammoron,Captain Moroni,Teancum

Where we are

Alma 51 ended with a javelin and a sentence: thus endeth the days of Amalickiah. A reader might expect the war to end with the man who started it. Alma 52 opens by quietly refusing that hope. The Lamanites wake on the first morning of the new year to find their king dead in his tent, and they are affrighted — but the war does not die with Amalickiah, because the ambition that animated him was never really his alone. It passes, within a few verses, to his brother. The brother of Amalickiah was appointed king... and his name was Ammoron (v. 3). Mormon's economy here is itself a teaching. The usurper is replaced by his own brother almost as quickly as a head is replaced on a hydra, and the new king's first act is to command his people to maintain those cities which they had taken by the shedding of blood (v. 4). The lesson is sobering and very much Mormon's: the spirit of unrighteous ambition does not end when one ambitious man dies. It is a posture of the heart that finds a new bearer. Killing Amalickiah was necessary; it was not sufficient. The war goes on under a new name that means the same thing.

The bulk of the chapter, though, turns from the enemy to Moroni and Teancum, and from the question of how the war began to the question of how a righteous people recovers what an unrighteous enemy has seized. The cities Amalickiah took in the chaos of the king-men crisis are now strongly held — fortified, ironically, with Moroni's own walls turned against him (51:27). They are too strong to storm. And so Mormon gives us a long, satisfying account of intelligence, patience, and stratagem: Teancum holding the line through a winter he cannot win by force, Moroni's careful orders about prisoners and passes, the failed embassy, and finally the decoy that draws the Lamanites out of Mulek and into a trap. This is the war-craft of a man who did not delight in bloodshed (48:11) — a commander who would rather take a city by wit than by slaughter, and who spares lives even in victory by holding prisoners for exchange rather than killing them. Where Amalickiah's cunning was the serpent's craft turned to seizing, Moroni's stratagem is honest skill turned to recovering and to sparing.

The chapter has four movements.

  1. Amalickiah dead, Ammoron crowned (vv. 1–4). The Lamanites wake to their slain king, abandon the drive northward, and fall back into Mulek; Ammoron, Amalickiah's brother, is made king and commands his armies to hold the cities taken by blood.
  2. Teancum holds the line; Moroni's orders (vv. 5–14). Judging the forts too strong to storm, Teancum fortifies and waits through the winter; Moroni sends reinforcements and orders — retain prisoners as ransom, secure the narrow pass, fortify, and seek by stratagem to retake the cities — while himself fighting on the west.
  3. The council and the decoy planned (vv. 15–22). Moroni reaches Bountiful; a council of war resolves to draw the Lamanites out; an embassy to Jacob the Zoramite fails; Moroni devises a decoy — Teancum to bait the enemy out of Mulek while Moroni marches by night to take the emptied city.
  4. Mulek retaken, the Lamanites surrounded (vv. 23–40). Teancum feigns retreat and the Lamanites pursue; Moroni takes the empty city; the pursuers, met by fresh troops under Lehi and caught between Lehi and Moroni, are surrounded; Jacob is killed and Moroni wounded in a furious clash; the rest surrender, the prisoners outnumbering the slain.

The verses that carry the chapter are these. Verse 4 names the enemy's hold — Ammoron commands them to maintain those cities which they had taken by the shedding of blood. Verse 8 gives Moroni's mercy in war — retain all the prisoners of the Lamanites as a ransom for those whom the Lamanites had taken. Verse 21 names the strategy — he resolved upon a plan that he might decoy the Lamanites out of their strongholds. And verses 36–37 give the recovered restraint — even in the trap, Moroni offers we will forbear shedding your blood if they will give up their weapons. The chapter exists to show the war's ambition surviving its author, and to set the righteous recovery of what was lost — by wisdom, patience, and the sparing of life — against the bloody seizing that took it.

The king is dead; long live the war (verses 1–4)

And now, it came to pass in the twenty and sixth year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi, behold, when the Lamanites awoke on the first morning of the first month, behold, they found Amalickiah was dead in his own tent; and they also saw that Teancum was ready to give them battle on that day. — Alma 52:1

The chapter opens on a tableau of fear: an army waking to find its king murdered in the night and an enemy drawn up for battle in the dawn. The psychological blow is total — when the Lamanites saw this they were affrighted; and they abandoned their design in marching into the land northward (v. 2). The whole momentum of the invasion, which had rolled up the entire east coast, collapses in a morning because one man is dead. There is a hard truth in this about the kind of power Amalickiah built. A movement organized entirely around one ambitious man's will is brittle; cut off the head and the body panics. The Lamanite host that feared nothing while Amalickiah lived now retreats into Mulek and sought protection in their fortifications the moment he is gone. This is the difference, Mormon implies, between an army gathered by a tyrant's hatred and a people defended by consecrated covenant: the one is held together by a single man and shatters when he falls; the other, like the Nephites, is held together by what Moroni called the cause of liberty and by faith in God, and does not depend on any one life.

And it came to pass that the brother of Amalickiah was appointed king over the people; and his name was Ammoron... And it came to pass that he did command that his people should maintain those cities, which they had taken by the shedding of blood; for they had not taken any cities save they had lost much blood. — Alma 52:3–4

And then, almost before the panic settles, the war has a new head. The brother of Amalickiah... his name was Ammoron. Mormon spends not a word mourning or marveling; the transition is brutally quick, and the speed is the point. The ambition that drove Amalickiah is a family inheritance and, more than that, a transmissible spirit — Ammoron is a Nephite by birth like his brother, another dissenter, another man of the same hardened mold. His first recorded command tells us everything about the kind of king he will be: maintain those cities which they had taken by the shedding of blood. He measures his conquests in blood spent and is determined to keep what blood has bought. This is the inverse of Moroni, who measured success in lives preserved and grieved every life he had to take. Ammoron values the cities precisely because they cost blood; the blood is, to him, the proof of their worth. Mormon's framing — for they had not taken any cities save they had lost much blood — is quietly damning: the enemy's only achievements are the things they paid for in slaughter, and they cling to them for that very reason. The war goes on, under a new name, with the same disregard for the lives it spends.

Teancum holds, and Moroni's orders (verses 5–14)

And now, Teancum saw that the Lamanites were determined to maintain those cities... and also seeing the enormity of their number, Teancum thought it was not expedient that he should attempt to attack them in their forts. But he kept his men round about, as if making preparations for war... And it came to pass that he kept thus preparing for war until Moroni had sent a large number of men to strengthen his army. — Alma 52:5–7

Teancum, the man who just won the war's single most decisive stroke, now does the harder and less glamorous thing: he waits. He sees clearly — the forts are too strong and the enemy too many to storm — and he has the discipline to act on what he sees rather than on the momentum of his recent triumph. He does not let the glory of slaying Amalickiah tempt him into an attack he cannot win. Instead he keeps his men round about, as if making preparations, fortifying and holding the line through the winter until reinforcements come. This is a real and underpraised form of courage — the courage to not attack, to hold a frustrating position without the relief of action, to wait for the right moment rather than force a premature one. The same Teancum who could move with lethal speed in the night can also sit still for months. Wisdom in war, Mormon shows, is knowing which the moment calls for; and the man who killed the king with a single thrust is wise enough to know that the next victory will require patience, not boldness.

And Moroni also sent orders unto him that he should retain all the prisoners who fell into his hands; for as the Lamanites had taken many prisoners, that he should retain all the prisoners of the Lamanites as a ransom for those whom the Lamanites had taken. — Alma 52:8

Here is one of the most humane verses in the war record, and it is easy to pass over as mere logistics. Moroni orders Teancum to retain the Lamanite prisoners — not to kill them, not to enslave them, but to hold them as a ransom for the Nephite captives the Lamanites have taken. The word ransom is doing real moral work. In a war this brutal, prisoners are a burden, and the easy course is to kill them. Moroni instead treats enemy lives as valuable precisely because they can be exchanged to recover his own people. The prisoners become a bridge by which Nephites in Lamanite hands can be brought home. This is the practical face of a man that did not delight in bloodshed (48:11): even captured enemies are kept alive, their lives counted as worth something — worth, specifically, the lives of the Nephites they can ransom. There is a quiet gospel shadow here too. The whole logic of ransom — that captives are recovered not by killing but by a price paid, a life held for a life freed — is the logic the scriptures use for Christ's own work, who gave his life a ransom for many (Matt. 20:28). Moroni's war policy, almost incidentally, runs along the grain of the Atonement: deliverance from captivity by ransom rather than by slaughter.

The council and the decoy (verses 15–22)

And in the commencement of the twenty and eighth year, Moroni and Teancum and many of the chief captains held a council of war—what they should do to cause the Lamanites to come out against them to battle; or that they might by some means flatter them out of their strongholds. — Alma 52:19

The problem is stated plainly in the council: the Lamanites are too strong behind their walls to be stormed, so the whole question becomes how to get them out. Notice that Moroni does not simply throw his men against the fortifications and accept the slaughter; he gathers his captains and thinks. The council of war is itself a mark of the man — power exercised through counsel rather than by a commander's lone will, the same instinct that made him act only according to the voice of the people in the last chapter. And the goal they settle on is to cause the Lamanites to come out onto fair ground, where numbers and walls matter less and skill and courage matter more. First they try the honest way: an embassy to the Lamanite commander, Jacob, inviting him to come out with his armies to meet them upon the plains between the two cities (v. 20). But Jacob — a Zoramite, another dissenter — would not come out. The straightforward challenge fails. The enemy will not fight fair, and so Moroni must find a way to make them fight on his terms without knowing it.

And it came to pass that Moroni, having no hopes of meeting them upon fair grounds, therefore, he resolved upon a plan that he might decoy the Lamanites out of their strongholds. — Alma 52:21

The word is decoy, and the plan that follows is a small masterpiece of misdirection: Teancum will take a small force down near the seashore to be seen and to draw the Lamanite army out in pursuit, while Moroni marches the main body by night through the wilderness to fall on the emptied city. It is worth dwelling on the moral character of this stratagem, because Mormon has spent the whole arc teaching us to distinguish kinds of cunning. Amalickiah, too, was a master of misdirection — he appeared to be subduing Lehonti while recruiting him, appeared loyal to the king while plotting his murder. The skill looks the same. But the ends are opposite, and the ends are everything. Amalickiah used deception to betray those who trusted him and to seize a throne; Moroni uses deception to outmaneuver an army that will not fight honestly, to recover cities stolen from his own people, and — crucially — to do it with as little blood as possible. The decoy is aimed at emptying a city so it can be taken without a siege, sparing lives on both sides. Honest war against a dishonest enemy may require stratagem; the question scripture keeps asking is not whether a man is clever but what his cleverness serves. Moroni's serves deliverance; Amalickiah's served himself.

Mulek retaken, and the surrounded enemy (verses 23–40)

And it came to pass that when the Lamanites saw that he began to flee, they took courage and pursued them with vigor. And while Teancum was thus leading away the Lamanites who were pursuing them in vain, behold, Moroni commanded that a part of his army who were with him should march forth into the city, and take possession of it. — Alma 52:24

The decoy works exactly as planned, and the execution is a near-replay of one of the oldest stratagems in scripture — Joshua's taking of Ai by a feigned flight that drew the defenders out so a hidden force could seize the empty city (Joshua 8). Teancum's small force shows itself, the Lamanites take courage at the sight of so few and pursue with vigor, and while they chase Teancum in vain down the coast, Moroni's hidden army walks into the undefended city and takes it. The Lamanites' own aggression is the instrument of their loss: their eagerness to crush a small enemy pulls them away from the thing they were guarding. There is a pattern here the war chapters keep returning to — the enemy undone by his own appetite. The Lamanites at Noah were doomed by a rash oath; Morianton was undone by his own passion; and now Jacob's army loses Mulek because it could not resist the bait of an easy kill. Aggression without discernment is a kind of blindness, and Moroni has learned to use the enemy's blindness as a weapon more powerful than his sword.

Now Moroni seeing their confusion, he said unto them: If ye will bring forth your weapons of war and deliver them up, behold we will forbear shedding your blood. — Alma 52:37

The trap closes hard — the pursuing Lamanites, met head-on by fresh troops under Lehi and finding Moroni's army at their backs, are surrounded between two forces while wearied because of their long march (v. 31). It is a complete encirclement, and the fighting that follows is furious: Jacob, having an unconquerable spirit, leads his men in a desperate charge to cut through to Mulek, and in the clash Moroni was wounded and Jacob was killed (v. 35). And here, at the moment of total advantage, Mormon shows us the thing that makes Moroni Moroni. With the enemy surrounded, exhausted, and leaderless, Moroni does not order a massacre. He offers terms: if ye will bring forth your weapons of war and deliver them up, behold we will forbear shedding your blood. The victor offers mercy in the instant he could choose slaughter. This is the same restraint Mormon praised in Alma 48 and the same ethic of war laid down in Alma 43 — that the sword is for defense and deliverance, never for vengeance, and that the moment an enemy yields, the killing stops. The detail Mormon records as the chapter's last word makes the point unmistakable: the number of prisoners who were taken exceeded more than the number of those who had been slain (v. 40). More were spared than were killed. In a chapter about recovering cities by stratagem, the deepest recovery is of the principle itself — that a righteous war is measured not by how many of the enemy it kills but by how few, and that even the surrounded and beaten enemy is offered his life if he will lay down his sword.

There is one figure worth a final glance: Jacob the Zoramite, of unconquerable spirit. Mormon gives the enemy commander a genuinely admiring phrase — unconquerable spirit is not faint praise — and then records his death in the same breath. It is a small tragedy set inside the larger one. Jacob is brave, resolute, unbreakable; he fights to the end and dies leading a charge. But his courage is spent in the service of a stolen cause, under a king crowned to maintain cities taken by the shedding of blood. Valor is not virtue; an unconquerable spirit poured into an unrighteous cause ends as Jacob ends — admired and dead, having accomplished nothing but more blood. Mormon, who never wastes a detail, lets Jacob stand as the warning shadow of the chapter: that the highest natural courage, severed from a righteous cause, is not heroism but waste. The same unconquerable spirit, given to liberty rather than to a usurper's war, would have made a Teancum. Given to Ammoron's cause, it makes only a brave man's grave.

How the chapter is built

Alma 52 is built as a study in continuation and recovery, and its two halves answer two different questions about a war that has lost its instigator. The short first movement (vv. 1–4) answers the question does the war end with Amalickiah? — and the answer, delivered with deliberate speed, is no: the brother is crowned almost before the body is cold, and the ambition transfers without missing a beat. Mormon builds this transition to be jarringly quick precisely so the reader feels the truth that the spirit of unrighteous ambition is not bound to any one man. The long second movement (vv. 5–40) then answers the harder question — how does a righteous people recover what such ambition has stolen? — and Mormon builds the answer as a slow, deliberate accumulation: patience (Teancum holding the line), humane policy (the prisoners held as ransom), counsel (the council of war), the failed honest attempt (the embassy), and finally the successful stratagem (the decoy). The architecture insists that recovery is not a single heroic stroke like the javelin of the last chapter but a patient, disciplined, many-stepped work — that undoing the damage of ambition takes far longer and far more wisdom than the moment of violence that caused it.

And the chapter is built to complete the arc's long meditation on cunning by giving us, at last, cunning in its righteous form. Mormon opened the Amalickiah story with deception used to betray and seize (Alma 47, the ʿormah and mirmah of the usurper); he closes it here with deception used to recover and to spare (Alma 52, the maʾarav of the decoy and the koper of the ransom). The two are placed at the arc's beginning and end as deliberate bookends, and the reader who has been trained by everything in between can finally see clearly what the whole arc has been teaching: that the skill is morally neutral and the end is everything. Amalickiah and Moroni are both masters of misdirection; the difference is that one used his mastery to climb over corpses to a throne and the other uses his to empty a city so it can be retaken without a siege, and to hold prisoners alive so captives can come home. By ending the arc with Moroni out-thinking an enemy who would not fight fair — and then, in the moment of total victory, offering that enemy his life — Mormon closes the long contrast he began in Alma 46. The man of God may be as wise as the serpent and must sometimes be as cunning in war; what he may never be is cruel, or self-seeking, or indifferent to the blood his cunning spares or spends. The last word of the chapter — that the prisoners outnumbered the slain — is Mormon's final verdict on the whole arc: that righteous power, even at the height of its victory, is measured by the lives it preserves.