Scriptural Savant

Home / Witnesses / Daughters of Ishmael

Daughters of Ishmael

Witness for

also known as the five daughters of Ishmael · the wife of Nephi · the eldest daughter of Ishmael · the wives of the brothers · the matriarchs of the second household

Departure from Jerusalem — wilderness journey — promised land (c. 600 – c. 580 BC) · 1 Nephi 7 – 2 Nephi 5

Five women, no names, two scenes of intercession, one collective speech, and the entire matriarchal line of the new world — five sisters who hold up the founding generation in the very places where the patriarchal record forgot to write them down.

What the Record Did Not Say

The wife of the prophet-founder of the Nephite people is not named in the Book of Mormon.

Read that sentence again. The woman who pleaded for Nephi's life when his brothers tied him to a rock in the wilderness, who wept for him a second time when he was bound on the ship in the storm, who bore his children in the wilderness, who walked beside him into the promised land, who was the matriarch of every king of Nephi for the next thousand years — that woman is named in the text only as my wife. The same is true of her four sisters. Five women, who collectively are the mothers of every Nephite and every Lamanite ever born, appear on the page without a single proper noun between them. We know their father's name. We know their husbands' names. We know their father's mother's name's homeland. We do not know any of theirs.

This is not because they did not matter. It is because the men writing the small plates wrote, like all patriarchal records, what their own fathers and brothers said and did, and let what their wives and sisters and daughters said and did fall into the quiet inheritance of family memory. The Restoration corrects much of this — the temple seals husbands and wives together, the Relief Society writes its own minutes, the genealogical labor of two centuries works to remember every name that was ever spoken. But the small plates did not write their names down. The Lord, who is the keeper of every name (Mosiah 26:18), knows them. He will speak them.

In the meantime, the record gives us enough of their actions to know what kind of women they were. Five sisters of the second household. One portrait, because the record gave them as one.

The Pleading Daughter

The first time a daughter of Ishmael speaks on the page, she is interceding for a prophet's life.

Nephi has been bound by Laman and Lemuel on the road back to camp. Two of the daughters of Ishmael — the future wives of Laman and Lemuel — have sided with their husbands (1 Nephi 7:6). The plot is to leave Nephi for the wild beasts.

Nevertheless, it came to pass that one of the daughters of Ishmael, yea, and also her mother, and one of the sons of Ishmael, did plead with my brethren, insomuch that they did soften their hearts; and they did cease striving to take away my life. (1 Nephi 7:19)

One of the daughters of Ishmael. The text does not name her. But the same text will tell us, nine chapters later, that Nephi married a daughter of Ishmael (1 Nephi 16:7). The interpreter who put these two passages together — most readers across two centuries — has reached the obvious conclusion: the daughter who pleaded for Nephi's life on the road home is the daughter Nephi married. She saw, in that scene with the ropes, who he was. She crossed her sisters' party line to stand for him. And when the marriages were made, the woman who had loosed his bonds became the woman who would bear his children.

This is the first marriage of the new world, narratively. The first scene of love in the Book of Mormon is a woman pleading for a young prophet's life with the very people her sisters had sided with. Not romance in any nineteenth-century sense — covenant. She chose him before she married him. She married him because she had already chosen him.

And the text never gives us her name.

The Eldest and the Convert

And it came to pass that I, Nephi, took one of the daughters of Ishmael to wife; and also, my brethren took of the daughters of Ishmael to wife; and also Zoram took the eldest daughter of Ishmael to wife. (1 Nephi 16:7)

The eldest daughter of Ishmael was given to Zoram.

Sit with that for a moment. The convert from Laban's household — the former servant who swore as the Lord liveth with Nephi on the wall of Jerusalem and was accepted as a covenant brother — receives the eldest daughter of the second patriarch. In the Hebrew patriarchal order, the firstborn daughter is the matriarchal jewel of the house. She is the daughter whose marriage is the most consequential, whose husband has the largest claim on the family inheritance. Rebekah is given to Isaac — the firstborn faithful. Leah is the elder daughter who must be married before Rachel (Genesis 29:26). The eldest daughter is the daughter the patriarch surrenders most carefully.

Ishmael gave her to Zoram.

The grafted branch received the firstborn matriarch. The convert, on his very first generation in the new dispensation, was honored in his marriage as fully as the natural-born sons of Lehi. There is no "lower tier" wife for the man whose blood was not Hebrew. The faithful convert receives the eldest. This is the pattern of Aseneth, the Egyptian wife of Joseph (Genesis 41:45), through whom Ephraim and Manasseh are born; of Ruth the Moabite who is grafted into the line of David; of Rahab who married Salmon. The Lord's covenant includes the grafted soul completely.

The eldest daughter is not named. She is, by the marriage, the matriarch of the Zoramite tribe (Jacob 1:13). Her seed becomes one of the seven named tribes of the Book of Mormon. The Zoramite apostasy in Alma 31 is not imputed to her any more than to Zoram — the conditional in 2 Nephi 1:32 explains the long trajectory. Her own marriage was a faithful one. Her unnamed name is in the line of every Zoramite who ever loved the Lord.

The Pattern of Jethro

If you have read the Pentateuch closely, you have seen this story before.

Moses flees Egypt. He comes to Midian — wilderness territory east of the Red Sea. He sits down at a well. The seven daughters of Reuel (later called Jethro) come to water their father's flocks. The local shepherds drive them off. Moses defends them. He is invited home. He marries one of them — Zipporah (Exodus 2:15–21).

Now overlay 1 Nephi. The sons of Lehi flee Jerusalem. They come to Jerusalem to retrieve Ishmael's family. Ishmael's daughters travel into the wilderness with their father. The sons of Lehi marry them in the wilderness (1 Nephi 16:7).

The pattern is the same. Wilderness exile + patriarch's daughters + Jewish foreigner + marriage in the wilderness = the founding-marriage pattern of the Pentateuch, restored. Moses is the Egyptian-trained Hebrew who marries the Midianite priest's daughter. Nephi is the Jerusalem-trained Hebrew who marries the Ishmaelite patriarch's daughter. Ishmael in the new dispensation is, etymologically and typologically, the Reuel/Jethro of the new world.

Then look at what happens next in Exodus. Zipporah saves Moses's life at a wilderness encampment (Exodus 4:24–26) — circumcising her son with a flint and casting it at Moses's feet, declaring Surely a bloody husband art thou to me. The wife of the Hebrew prophet, in the wilderness, intercedes for his life when the Lord seeks to slay him.

Then read 1 Nephi 7:19 again. One of the daughters of Ishmael pleads for Nephi's life when his own brothers seek to slay him.

The Jethro-Zipporah-Moses pattern is the Ishmael-eldest daughter-Zoram pattern AND the Ishmael-Nephi's wife-Nephi pattern at the same time. The Book of Mormon is doing what the Bible does — using one founding-family typology to validate the next one. Joseph Smith could not have known this in 1829. The pattern was in the record. It came through.

The Voice at Nahom

Twice in 1 Nephi the women of the founding generation speak collectively, and the second time is at Nahom.

And it came to pass that the daughters of Ishmael did mourn exceedingly, because of the loss of their father, and because of their afflictions in the wilderness; and they did murmur against my father, because he had brought them out of the land of Jerusalem, saying: Our father is dead; yea, and we have wandered much in the wilderness, and we have suffered much affliction, hunger, thirst, and fatigue; and after all these sufferings we must perish in the wilderness with hunger. (1 Nephi 16:35)

This is a long verse for the small plates to give to women in grief. Read what they are saying: our father is dead, we have wandered much, we have suffered hunger and thirst and fatigue, and we are about to perish. Every clause is true. Their father is dead. They have wandered much — 1 Nephi 17:4 will tell us they "did sojourn for the space of many years" in the wilderness. They have suffered hunger and thirst. The broken bow chapter is the next chapter. They are about to perish.

The text does not condemn their grief. It names their murmuring as murmuring, but it does not erase what they had to mourn. The Lord had taken their father from them, in the middle of a wilderness, on the road to a country they had never seen and could not imagine. The daughters of Ishmael speaking at Nahom are doing exactly what the daughters of Jerusalem in Lamentations do, exactly what the daughters of Israel in Judges 11 do over Jephthah's daughter, exactly what the daughters of Zion in Isaiah do when their city is destroyed. They are the qinah — the lamentation — of a wilderness people who have lost a patriarch.

And the Lord's response — not in the text immediately, but in the eventual restoration of the bow and the working of the Liahona and the bringing of the colony to Bountiful — is the response that always follows grief in scripture. Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God (Isaiah 40:1). The verb naḥam in Isaiah 40:1 is the very root of the place name Nahom. The Lord whose hand is on the wilderness lets His daughters lament at the place named for lament. Then He comforts them. The same root, working in both directions.

The Tears on the Ship

The pleading happens twice. The first time, on the road home, one daughter and her mother and one brother loose the ropes (1 Nephi 7:19). The second time, on the ship in the storm, the daughters of Ishmael — plural now — and Nephi's wife and his children plead for him.

Wherefore, they durst not lay their hands upon me; and they did not lay their hands upon me. Now it came to pass that I, Nephi, did pray unto the Lord; and after I had prayed the winds did cease, and the storm did cease, and there was a great calm. (1 Nephi 18:21)

Read the verses before:

And it came to pass that they were angry with me, saying: We will not loose thee. And it came to pass that the Lord was with me, and... I did say unto them many things... And it came to pass that they would not loose me. And after we had been driven back upon the waters for the space of four days, my brethren began to see that the judgments of God were upon them, and that they must perish save that they should repent of their iniquities; wherefore, they came unto me, and loosed the bands which were upon my wrists... And it came to pass that they did soften their hearts. (1 Nephi 18:11–20)

The text tells us, in 1 Nephi 18:19, why the brothers softened: Nevertheless, Laman and Lemuel did not take away their anger from me; and they were angry with me even because I did exhort them to faithfulness; but my father did speak many things unto them, and also unto the sons of Ishmael; but, behold, they did breathe out much threatenings against any one that should speak for me; and my parents being stricken in years, and having suffered much grief because of their children, they were brought down, yea, even upon their sick-beds.

And then verse 19: Now they durst not do this lest my father should die; wherefore, they durst not loose me, lest my wife with her tears and prayers, and also my children, should not soften the hearts of my brethren that they would loose me.

That sentence is one of the most tangled in 1 Nephi, but read it carefully. The brothers durst not loose Nephi because they were afraid of their father's death, AND they durst not refuse to loose him because of Nephi's wife's tears and his children's tears. The wife of the prophet, with her children clinging to her — these unnamed children of an unnamed mother — was the second pressure on the brothers' hearts. Lehi sinking on the sick-bed was the first. Nephi's wife weeping was the second. Between the dying father and the weeping wife, the brothers softened.

This is the second pleading. The same daughter who loosed Nephi's bands on the road home, now with her children clinging to her skirts, weeps for him on the heaving deck of a ship she did not ask to sail in, and her tears do what no doctrine and no argument from her husband can do. They did soften their hearts. The wife of the prophet is the soft pressure that the wilderness and the storm cannot harden.

She is not named.

The Splitting of the Camp

When Nephi flees Laman and Lemuel in 2 Nephi 5, the small plates give us, for one verse, a roster.

Wherefore, it came to pass that I, Nephi, did take my family, and also Zoram and his family, and Sam, mine elder brother, and his family, and Jacob and Joseph, my younger brethren, and also my sisters, and all those who would go with me. And all those who would go with me were those who believed in the warnings and the revelations of God. (2 Nephi 5:6)

My family. And also Zoram and his family. And Sam... and his family. Three of the daughters of Ishmael cross the wilderness one more time. The eldest, with Zoram. The wife of Sam, with Sam. The wife of Nephi, with Nephi. The two daughters who married Laman and Lemuel — the same two who had sided with their husbands on the road home in 1 Nephi 7 — stay behind in the Lamanite camp. The household splits cleanly along the line their marriages first drew.

This is the painful part of the portrait. The five sisters are not all on the same side at the end of the founding generation. The covenant separates them. The two who chose rebellious husbands carry their seed into the Lamanite line. The three who chose faithful husbands carry their seed into the Nephite line. Neither line is finally separable — Ishmael's blood is in both — but the sisters do not see each other again on the page.

What happens when the wife of Laman and the wife of Sam, who shared a tent in the wilderness for five years, look up one night from their own fires across the new continent and remember that they once braided each other's hair in Ishmael's house? The record does not say. The Restoration's promise that all things shall be revealed, even the things which never have been revealed (D&C 121:28–32), means that there are reunions reserved for these sisters in the world to come that the small plates could not yet write down. The Lord knows their names. He knows whose tents are which. He will gather them.

Banot — The Daughters of Thousands of Millions

There is a Hebrew phrase, used in Genesis 24:60, in the blessing pronounced on Rebekah as she leaves her father's house to marry Isaac. Her family blesses her with this:

Thou art our sister, be thou the mother of thousands of millions, and let thy seed possess the gate of those which hate them.

The phrase in Hebrew is bě-ʾalpê rěbābâ — the mother of thousands of myriads. It is the standard patriarchal-blessing formula for a daughter being given in marriage. Banotdaughters — is the noun the formula governs. The daughter receiving the blessing is being told that the seed of her body will fill the earth.

Read it slowly. Be thou the mother of thousands of millions. Then read 1 Nephi 16:7 again: I, Nephi, took one of the daughters of Ishmael to wife; and also, my brethren took of the daughters of Ishmael to wife; and also Zoram took the eldest daughter of Ishmael to wife.

Five daughters. Five marriages. The text gives us, in five clauses, the founding of an entire civilization. Every Nephite who ever drew breath. Every Lamanite who ever did. Every prophet who wrote on the small plates after the founding generation. Every king of Nephi. Every righteous Lamanite of the long arc that runs from Lamoni to the Anti-Nephi-Lehies to Samuel the Lamanite. Every descendant whom the Restoration gathers in our own century from the indigenous peoples of the Americas. All of them are banot-descendants of Ishmael's five daughters.

Rebekah's family blessed her with that formula. Ishmael's family, in the chaos of the wilderness journey, never recorded a blessing on his five daughters in the small plates. But the fulfillment of the banot formula is so total in their lives that the blessing must have been pronounced somewhere — over a tent fire, in a father's last hours, in a mother's grip on a daughter's hand as the daughter walked toward her husband's tent. The text does not preserve the words. The record of their seed is the words.

Thousands of millions. Five women, five marriages, one continent's worth of descendants. The covenant kept its end.

What the Restoration Restores

When Joseph Smith translated 1 Nephi in 1829, he did not yet know — could not yet know — what the Restoration would do with the unnamed mothers of the small plates.

By the time of the Kirtland endowment, the Lord had revealed that a woman is not without the man, neither the man without the woman, in the Lord (1 Corinthians 11:11, restored in temple language). By the time of Nauvoo, the Relief Society had been organized and the temple sealing began binding husbands and wives into the eternal pattern. By the time of the modern temple, the names of women who had no surnames in their own century are written into the sealing records along with their husbands'. The five daughters of Ishmael may be sealed to their husbands today by name — names the Lord has kept, names that the genealogical work of the Restoration believes are coming — or, if their names cannot be recovered in mortal records, by the Lord's own promise that He knows them and will gather them.

The unnamed wife of Nephi is going to be named again. The unnamed eldest daughter of Ishmael who married Zoram is going to be named again. The unnamed wives of Sam and Laman and Lemuel are going to be named again. Whether by the discovery of some ancient inscription or by the unsealed revelation that is reserved for the Millennium or by the simple direct hand of the Lord on the heads of His daughters in the world to come — they will be named. The record's silence is not the Lord's silence. It is the patriarchal record's silence, and the Restoration was given, in part, to repair it.

In the meantime, the actions are what we have. The pleading on the road. The eldest given to the convert. The mourning at Nahom. The tears on the ship. The walking-away with the faithful brother. Five women, five faithful actions (or four faithful and one rebellious, by the count of the marriages), and the whole matriarchal line of the new world.

What They Were

They were five sisters of Jerusalem who left their city on the day their father left, walked into a wilderness they had not chosen, watched two of their sisters take the rebels' side and three take the prophets' side, were married in the dust of a desert encampment, bore children who would become a continent, mourned their father at the place of grieving, wept for their husbands in the storm, walked into a country their grandfathers could not have imagined, and built — out of their own bodies, with the daily exhausting unwritten work of mothering in a covenant household — the first generation of the new world.

The record gives us their actions and withholds their names. The Lord knows their names. He has them written somewhere — in the book of life, in the seals on His daughters' foreheads, in the Lamb's own remembrance — and the day will come when those names are spoken aloud. When that day comes, we will not be surprised. We will have been waiting for it since 1 Nephi 7:19.


Five sisters, no names, two scenes of intercession, one collective lamentation, and the whole matriarchal line of the new world. They are the daughters whose seed became the thousands of millions, and the Lord — who knows every name His daughters bear — will speak theirs aloud in the day when the patriarchal records are at last completed.